Skip to main content

Node JS Multiplying Float Matrices

I don't know why I wrote such stupid code for readMatrix.js. I guess when someone uses a new language their brain cells seize up, effective function becomes impossible.

After tests I ran on Friday, I wanted to see how Javascript does with floating point numbers? JS only supports 64 bit floating-point numbers, but there must be special code in their to make integers look like integers ... unless their isn't.

When I went to update my code to support numbers with fractions, my first thought was to flag whether a decimal point had been seen and then keep track of the value by which to divide, multiplying by ten for each fractional digit. I quickly realized I was sinking into the mire of coding stupidity; JS must have a function to convert strings into integers or floats, and indeed it has parseInt() and parseFloat(). But in my research I discovered ( or re-discovered ) that there's no need for the conversion. Like Perl, JS allows arithmetic on the string representation of numbers:

    1  +  2 ⇛ 3
   "1" + "2"⇛ 3

This made me think about how I would parse the file in Perl, using split(). I knew JS had map(), so quite likely it would have split() as well. And it does! So all that manual processing went in the trash, and I simplified readMatrix.js to


   exports.readMatrix = function (err, data) {
      if (err) {
         throw err;
      }
      var rows = data.split(/ *\n/)
                     .filter(function(val) {
                         return val.length > 0;
                      });
      var matrix = [], i, len;
      for ( 1 = 0, len = rows.length; i<len; i++ ) {
         matrix[i] = rows[i].split(/ +/);
      }
      return matrix;                  
   }; 

I think I had the two chunks merged, in an online TryIt editor I was experimenting with,but this is compact enough for the moment.


{Correction - Although the original JS used only floats, including for integer values, Googles V* JS engine, the one used in node.js, has separate 32 bit integers.}

Although integers are represented by 64-bit IEEE floating point numbers, integer multpiplication is still 3 times as fast as floating point multiplication. There are clearly optimizations that are being made use of to improve performance.

Calculating average operations per second shows small matrixes have performance limited by other overhead, but larger matrices are pumping along at 7.8 million multiplications per second. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Perl5, Moxie and Enumurated Data Types

Moxie - a new object system for Perl5 Stevan Little created the Moose multiverse to upgrade the Perl 5 programming language's object-oriented system more in line with the wonderfull world of Perl 6. Unfortunately, it's grown into a bloated giant, which has inspired light-weight alternatives Moos, Moo, Mo, and others. Now he's trying to create a modern, efficient OO system that can become built into the language. I've seen a few of his presentations at YAPC (Yet Another Perl Conference, now known as TPC, The Perl Conference), among them ‎p5 mop final final v5 this is the last one i promise tar gz While the package provides some POD documentation about the main module, Moxie, it doesn't actually explain the enum package, Moxie::Enum. But delving into the tests directory reveals its secrets. Creating an Enum package Ranks { use Moxie::Enum; enum by_ARRAY => qw( unused 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 J Q K A ); enum by_HASH => { 2 => 2, 3 =...

AI crap at 100 words a minute

I requested an AI to  create an astable multivibrator that can oscillate at 100KHz with a 50% duty cycle. Of course, this isn't an essay topic, it's a (trivial) electronic circuit. But it set out to provide the required number of words without actually saying anything useful. Here's what came out ... Note the reference to an article from 1968, long before any modern technology. In particular, getting through several paragraphs about oscillators without mentioning the 55 timer ic is unimaginable.

Making a Re-Saw Saw

I made a framing saw from a kit at a Lee Valley workshop, and it was fabulous. It's great as a coping saw, cutting curves, but the thin blade makes it hard to cut a straight line. So I made another one on my own, using a chunk of bandsaw blade, and this was better for straight cuts. But trying to resaw a 1" thick boards into two 1/2" inch boards was impossible. The cut would wander all over the place. I would practically wind up with veneer. I saw a number of articles and YouTube videos about making a re-sawing saw, and I decided to make one. But I'm not keen on kits. For one thing I'm stingy, and don't like giving away the profit. Besides, it doesn't feel like I made it, if someone else provided the challenging parts. So I made my own. The saw blade is cut from one of three rusty handsaw blades I got for $10 off Facebook Marketplace. I used an angle grinder to cut it out, a little over two inches wide, and to grind three-to-the-inch teeth...